What Are Tier 1 Countries?
Tier 1 Countries:
|Country||Tier 1 frequency||Country|
|Ireland||Many sources||United Kingdom|
|Italy||Most sources||United States|
8 weitere Zeilen
What does Tier 1 countries mean?
World Bank Tiers
| * Nations are grouped in tiers based on World Bank’s system for classifying national economies by income per capita. Tier 1 corresponds to the World Bank’s list of high income nations and Tier 2 the upper middle income nations. Tier 3 includes all nations whose economies do not yet reach the Tier 2 level. To learn more about this system see World Bank’s country classifications. The number next to each country on the list below represents its Tier. Tier 1 Countries – Regular Submission Fee $125.00 Tier 2 Countries – (Reduced by $45) $80.00 Tier 3 Countries – (Reduced by $85) $40.00 Use the chart below to determine the submission fee in your country.
** ACCI cannot do financial transactions with authors working in Cuba, Sudan, Iraq, Iran, or the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea). If you are a citizen of one of these countries, please first contact the ACCI office at for more information.
World Bank Tiers
What are Tier 2 countries?
The USCIRF defines Tier 2 countries as those where the violations engaged in or tolerated by the government are serious and are characterized by at least one of the elements of the ‘systematic, ongoing, and egregious’ standard for ‘countries of particular concern’ (CPCs, a formal State Department designation; see
Is the Netherlands a Tier 1 country?
Tier-1 Countries – You can consider the following ones:
- Other countries such as Ireland, Iceland, Netherlands, Singapore, Hong Kong, France or China could also be considered in this group.
- Pros of Tier 1 countries:
- 1. You can usually receive higher payouts
- 2. People usually have a greater GDP and therefore they’re more likely to spend money
- 3. In most of them english is a fluently spoken language
- 4. Citizens usually have credit cards
- 5. Very big audience and increasing, especially in mobile
- Cons of Tier 1 countries:
1. Competition. A lot of competition. You don’t need it when you don’t have experience and don’t know all the dirty tricks that big media buyers use in their campaigns.2. Expensive traffic. Take a look at the competition score and average CPC.3. Strict regulations.
- For example, now it’s hard to run pin submits in tier 1 countries.
- It’s also harder with CC trial offers.4.
- The market is saturated: it’s hard to find something new that catches people’s attention.,5.
- A big part of the population is using Ad Blockers.
- I think you already got my point now.
- If you’re unprepared, without good knowledge of how things work in media buying, it’s better for you to wait for the Tier 1 countries and focus on the other ones, at least until you gain some experience.
Let’s take a look at them!
What countries are in Tier 1 list?
Tier-1 Countries – Tier-1 countries produce the most desired type of traffic. These areas have strong, established economies and consumers with high acquisitional power. The list of tier-1 countries includes the US, Canada, the UK, Switzerland, Sweden, Norway, New Zealand, Australia, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Ireland, Germany, France, Finland, Denmark, Belgium, Austria, Spain, and Italy. Pros The pros of tier-1 offers include:
Higher payoutUsually promote high-quality, appealing products/promotionsPlenty of offers to choose fromWell-established traffic sources
Cons Some of the cons of tier-1 offers are:
Very competitive spaceMuch more expensive than other tiersMore difficult to convert, so they have more riskStrict regulationsProducing creative content may be challenging
What is a Tier 3 country?
A Guide To The Tiers – Tier 1 Countries whose governments fully comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking. Tier 2 Countries whose governments do not fully comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards but are making significant efforts to bring themselves into compliance with those standards.
Tier 2 Watch List Countries whose governments do not fully comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards, but are making significant efforts to bring themselves into compliance with those standards AND: a) the absolute number of victims of severe forms of trafficking is very significant or is significantly increasing; b) there is a failure to provide evidence of increasing efforts to combat severe forms of trafficking in persons from the previous year, including increased investigations, prosecution, and convictions of trafficking crimes, increased assistance to victims, and decreasing evidence of complicity in severe forms of trafficking by government officials; or c) the determination that a country is making significant efforts to bring itself into compliance with minimum standards was based on commitments by the country to take additional steps over the next year.
Tier 3 Countries whose governments do not fully comply with the minimum standards and are not making significant efforts to do so. The TVPA lists additional factors through which to determine whether a country should be on Tier 2 (or Tier 2 Watch List) versus Tier 3.
First, the extent to which the country is a country of origin, transit, or destination for severe forms of trafficking. Second, the extent to which the country’s government does not comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards and, in particular, the extent to which officials or government employees have been complicit in severe forms of trafficking.
And third, reasonable measures required to bring the government into compliance with the minimum standards in light of the government’s resources and capabilities to address and eliminate severe forms of trafficking in persons. In 2008, the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act included a provision that any country that has been ranked Tier 2 Watch List for two consecutive years and that would otherwise be ranked Tier 2 Watch List for the next year will instead be ranked Tier 3 for the next year.
This provision comes into effect for the first time in this year’s report. The Secretary of State, through delegation, can waive the automatic downgrade based on credible evidence that a waiver is justified because the government has a written plan that, if implemented, would constitute making significant efforts to comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking and is devoting sufficient resources to implement the plan.
Governments subject to the automatic downgrade provision are noted as such within the country narratives.
What is a Tier 5 country?
This is a visa scheme under Tier 5 visas category that is only open to people aged between 18 and 30 who are nationals of Australia, Canada, Japan, Monaco, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Republic of Korea or Taiwan, or who are British Overseas citizens, British Overseas Territories citizens or British National Overseas citizens.
What is Tier 4 countries?
|Congo, Democratic Republic of||Tier 4|
|Congo, Republic of||Tier 4|
|Cook Islands||Tier 4|
Is China a Tier 3 country?
March 19, 2021 Posted by Reading Time: 3 minutes
Industrial reforms needed to boost manufacturing efficiencies Country to embark on a 30-year program of improvement Status identifies areas of potential foreign investment interest
Miao Wei (苗圩), China’s Vice-Chairman of the CPPCC National Economic Committee and former Minister of Industry and Information Technology, stated at the recent Two Sessions meetings that China’s manufacturing strength is still that of a Tier-3 global power.
- Miao is not just a politician, but an astute businessman.
- Prior to his political career, Miao was President of Dongfeng Motors, then China’s second biggest carmaker.
- He was credited with rescuing Dongfeng from near bankruptcy and turning it into a profitable company.
- Miao stated that while China has become a large manufacturer, the lack of control of core technologies making up the top end of the global value chain shows China still lacks Tier-1 manufacturing strength.
His comments are part of the CPPCC process to plan China’s growth in a systematic manner and why they were discussed the Two Sessions meetings. Miao said that China remains heavily dependent on imports of basic components and technologies (over 50 percent come from abroad), integrated circuits (80 percent imported), large-scale and high-quality imports of castings and forgings (90 percent imported), and imports of high-end hydraulic parts and seals (100 percent dependent on imports).
Weak innovation in manufacturing: The level and the quality of R&D are insufficient. This deters and hinders innovation. Lack of fundamental capabilities: This includes common yet key technologies that would allow significant improvements in the manufacturing value chain. Product quality and reliability: The products and their quality need to be improved as the industry currently faces issues relative to its quality deficiency. Chinese equipment may not be as competitive as the international brands within the world’s equipment manufacturing industry. These are currently owned by more developed countries. Industrial supply chain: China’s industrial supply chain requires improvement as it produces overcapacity in the low value-added products and has a shortage of capacity in high value-added products.
The Tier 3 Theory Miao introduced his “Tier 3 Theory” to guide China towards a path for development in manufacturing in 2015. According to this theory, the global manufacturing industry is characterized by a four-tier pyramid.
Tier-1 is the global technological innovation center, currently dominated by the US. Tier-2 is high-end manufacturing, dominated by the EU and Japan. Tier-3 is low-end manufacturing, made up of major developing countries, including China. Tier-4 includes resource-exporting countries, including the OPEC states, Africa, Latin America, and others.
The China Manufacturing Power Development Index In the 2020 China Manufacturing Power Development Index Report (released by the Chinese Academy of Engineering since 2015), the US ranked first, with an index value of 168.71. Germany and Japan emerged in the second tier with indices of 125.65 and 117.16, respectively.
China, in fourth place, remains close to Japan with an index of 110.84. South Korea, France, and the United Kingdom followed China. Relevance to foreign investors The weaknesses in China’s current industrial structure represent opportunities for foreign investors involved in these sectors and who may wish to take advantage of shortages and restructuring and be based in China – to provide R&D, technological innovations, and new solutions.
Some of these are in areas where the West is already ahead and in possession of technologies also now nearing the end of a production cycle, but which may be beneficial to China as a steppingstone. Attention to China’s so-called ‘Negative List’, which outlines the industrial sectors open to foreign investors and applicable incentives for this, provides intelligence on where China sees foreign investment as key.
An explanation of the latest negative list, issued six months ago, can be found here, Attention may also be paid to China’s Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and can be reviewed here, and the foreign investment encouraged catalogue here, A further examination of what China intends to do can be seen in the ‘Made In China 2025′ plan.
This is categorized into different sectors and can be seen as follows:
What rank is Netherlands for living?
Consistently a global top performer – Numbeo is the world’s largest crowd-sourced quality of life database, combining information on housing indicators, perceived crime rates, healthcare quality, transport quality, and other statistics for countries and cities all around the globe. Their takes into account several factors including:
- Purchasing power
- Pollution level and climate index
- Affordability of housing
- Cost of living
- Safety index
- Quality of healthcare system
- Traffic commute times
The Netherlands ranked #1 for overall quality of life globally, scoring High to Very High in all the above categories with the exception of pollution levels (Low), traffic commute time (Very Low), and cost of living (Moderate). Denmark and Switzerland took the remaining top spots.
What rank is Netherlands in Europe?
The essential economic performance of a country is reflected by the gross domestic product, the total of all goods and services sold. Worldwide gross domestic product in 2021 was at about 12,232 USD per capita. GDP in the Netherlands, on the other hand, reached USD 57,768 per capita, or 1.013 trillion USD for the whole country.
The Netherlands is therefore one of the world’s largest economies and is currently at rank 17. If this is calculated per inhabitant, taking purchasing power parity into account, then the Netherlands rank 15th in the list of the richest countries, Inflation in the Netherlands in 2021 was around 2.68%.
Within the EU, the average in the same year was 2.55 percent. In the United States, it was most recently 4.70%. The index for perceived corruption in the public sector is 80, which is above average by global standards. Back to overview: Netherlands
Where are the Netherlands ranked?
The Netherlands claims top spot in international quality of life ranking – While the Netherlands generally does tend to do quite well when it comes to these kinds of rankings, it’s rare that the country manages to beat out its Scandinavian neighbours to claim the top spot.
- But this year, the Netherlands managed to rise through the ranks, swapping its third-place position in 2022 for the top spot in 2023.
- The Netherlands achieved an overall score of 196,7, performing particularly well when it came to average commute times (7th place), purchasing power (8th place), and the healthcare system (10th place).
In fact, the Netherlands managed to place in the top 30 across all factors – but its poorest score was definitely (and perhaps unsurprisingly) for its weather (30th place). Interestingly, Dutch cities also performed well in Numbeo’s separate city ranking, with The Hague and Eindhoven claiming the top two spots, and Rotterdam managing to secure a place in the top 10.
Is China Tier 1?
Background – Many economists, consultants and businesses classify cities in China based on the tier system. Businesses frequently refer to the tier system in, for example, devising marketing strategy, as it is understood that treating China as one market is simply not feasible: consumers from different regions and cities have vastly different income levels, behaviors, and trends.
Cities in different tiers also differ greatly in population size, infrastructure, and the level of sophistication in products and services. Given the sheer number of cities in China, there is not a single version of this classification. According to many media publications, it is understood that there are four tiers, and the consensus is that four cities belong to Tier-1 ( Chinese : 一线城市 ): Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen (colloquially known as “Bei-Shang-Guang-Shen”, 北上广深).
First-tier cities represent the most developed areas of the country with the most affluent and sophisticated consumers. They are large, densely populated urban metropolises that have huge economic, cultural and political influence in China.
Is Belgium a Tier 1 country?
Vatican City), Latvia, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Tier 1 countries means Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy (incl.
Is China a Tier 1 country?
Tier 2 Countries Countries in the tier 2 category include Brazil, Japan, China and Turkey.
What tier is Russia?
RUSSIA: Tier 3 – The Government of Russia does not fully meet the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking and is not making significant efforts to do so, even considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, if any, on its anti-trafficking capacity; therefore Russia remained on Tier 3.
- Despite the lack of significant efforts, the government took some steps to address trafficking, including by facilitating the return of Russian children from Iraq and Syria, identifying some victims, and extending work and residence permits for foreign workers in response to the pandemic.
- However, during the reporting period there was a government policy or pattern of trafficking.
The government was actively complicit in the forced labor of North Korean workers. The government did not screen North Korean workers for trafficking indicators or identify any North Korean trafficking victims, despite credible reports in previous years that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) operated work camps in Russia and exploited thousands of North Korean workers in forced labor.
- Although the government took steps to repatriate North Korean workers in accordance with UN Security Council resolutions (UNSCRs), citizens from the DPRK continued to arrive throughout the year, many of whom likely engaged in informal labor.
- While the Russian government reported the number of North Korean workers in Russia declined in 2020, the government issued almost 3,000 new tourist and student visas to North Koreans in 2020 in an apparent attempt to circumvent the UNSCRs.
Separate from this complicity, the government did not initiate any new prosecutions of suspected traffickers and convicted only one trafficker. Authorities continued to lack a process for the identification of victims and their referral to care, and the total number of victims identified by the government remained negligible compared with the estimated scope of the problem.
Moreover, the criminal code did not establish a definition for a victim of trafficking, hindering identification efforts and limiting access to victim services. Authorities routinely penalized potential victims, including by detaining and deporting potential forced labor victims for immigration violations, and prosecuted sex trafficking victims for prostitution crimes without screening for trafficking indicators.
The government offered no funding or programs to provide services for trafficking victims. As in previous years, the government did not draft a national strategy or assign roles and responsibilities to government agencies to combat human trafficking.
What tier is Ukraine?
Ukraine ( Tier 2 )
Is Japan a Tier 2 country?
Japan (Tier 2) – The Government of Japan does not fully meet the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking but is making significant efforts to do so. The government demonstrated overall increasing efforts compared to the previous reporting period, considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, if any, on its anti-trafficking capacity; therefore Japan remained on Tier 2.
These efforts included identifying more trafficking victims and continuing to implement public awareness campaigns. The government also officially recognized four Technical Intern Training Program (TITP) participants as trafficking victims, the first time the government has recognized TITP participants as trafficking victims.
However, the government did not meet the minimum standards in several key areas. Continued lack of political will to address all forms of trafficking and identify and protect trafficking victims contributed to the government’s overall lack of progress.
- Authorities continued to prosecute and convict traffickers under laws prescribing insufficiently stringent penalties and delivered suspended sentences in nearly half of all cases, while some traffickers received only fines.
- These actions significantly weakened deterrence, undercut efforts to hold traffickers accountable, and did not adequately address the heinous nature of the crime.
Law enforcement bodies continued to identify hundreds of children exploited in the commercial sex industry without screening them for trafficking indicators and did not formally designate them as trafficking victims, hindering their access to protection services and judicial recourse, and allowing child sex traffickers to operate with impunity.
Reports of forced labor among labor migrants working in Japan under TITP persisted in much higher numbers than that which the government identified during the reporting period. Within TITP, the government’s memoranda of cooperation with sending countries remained ineffective in preventing foreign-based labor recruitment agencies from charging excessive fees—a key driver of debt-based coercion among TITP participants—and the government did not take any measures to hold recruiters and employers accountable for labor trafficking crimes under this system.
Authorities continued to rely on disparate, ineffective identification and referral procedures, which did not cover all forms of trafficking, therefore officials continued to punish unidentified victims for unlawful acts traffickers compelled them to commit.
What are Tier 2 and Tier 3 countries?
What do advertisers usually want? – Generally, advertisers want specific sets of GEOs that are called “Tiers”. There are 3 tiers, based on clients’ purchasing power: Tier 1 – a geo set that every CPA marketer desires to work with. The wealthiest countries and the most competitive GEOs.
Tier 2 – Less competitive locations and lower average income per person. Tier 3 – Developing countries and consumers with a low purchasing power.Here is the list (we have selected the most popular locations in each Tier):
|Tier 1||Tier 2||Tier 3|
|Australia Austria Belgium Canada Denmark Finland France Germany Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands New Zealand Norway Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom United States of America||Andorra Argentina Bahamas Belarus Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia Fiji Greece Guyana Hong Kong Hungary Iceland Indonesia Israel Japan Kazakhstan Latvia Lithuania Macao Malaysia Malta Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Oman Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of Korea (South) Romania Russian Federation Saudi Arabia Serbia Singapore Slovakia Slovenia South Africa Thailand Turkey Ukraine United Arab Emirates Uruguay Vanuatu||Albania Algeria Angola Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belize Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Cape Verde Chad Comoros Congo El Salvador Ethiopia Gabon Georgia Guatemala Guinea Haiti Honduras India Iraq Jamaica Jordan Kenya Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Lebanon Lesotho Macedonia Madagascar Mali Mauritania Mauritius Moldova Mongolia Mozambique Namibia Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Pakistan Senegal Sri Lanka Suriname Swaziland Tajikistan Tanzania Togo Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkmenistan Uganda Uzbekistan Vietnam Zambia|
In addition, we have compiled a list of Tier 4 countries – countries under international sanctions, engaged in civil war or with collapsed economics: Afghanistan, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Iran, Liberia, Libya, Myanmar, North Korea, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Venezuela, Yemen, Zimbabwe Apart from the purchasing power, there are some other criteria (advertising ones), which define what Tier the country would belong to:
Conversion price Traffic price Laws and regulations in each specific country
Working with each Tier has both pros and cons, and being a CPA marketer, you should weigh up all the options.
Is USA a Tier 1 country?
United States – The United States has the highest population of any Tier 1 country (and the third-largest in the world), with 339.13 million people at the start of 2023. The state of California has the highest population of any state in the US, with 39.2 million legal residents, but the country’s most populous city is New York City, with approximately 8.4 million people (20.1 million metropolitan) and a density of 2,309.2/km2.
Is Thailand a Tier 3 country?
Thailand ( Tier 2 )
What is Tier 1 or Tier 2?
How Do Tier 1 and Tier 2 Support Each Other? – Tier 1 instruction is standards-driven, focusing on students’ broad skills and generalizing to a learning target. In contrast, Tier 2 intervention targets a specific skill deficit that has been identified through assessment. Instruction and intervention targets this specific skill.
- Educators develop a support plan to address the targeted skill with intervention tools that address the need and monitor growth on that specific skill with a normed progress monitoring tool.
- Ongoing progress monitoring of Tier 2 interventions helps teachers identify if students are improving and responding to the intervention.
If students make progress and achieve Tier 2 intervention plan goals, the students’ learning gap has been addressed, and they can continue with Tier 1 core instruction without the additional targeted support. A key difference between Tier 1 instruction and Tier 2 intervention is the focus on targeted skills.
- When teachers delineate Tier 1 and Tier 2 processes, they bring cohesion to their efforts around supporting student learning.
- Students are supported at a deeper level during core instruction.
- Teachers gain a clearer understanding of students that actually do need additional targeted instructional support.
Data is used to inform instruction and intervention, and teachers strengthen their practice by being more efficient and effective.
What is Tier 4 countries?
|Congo, Democratic Republic of||Tier 4|
|Congo, Republic of||Tier 4|
|Cook Islands||Tier 4|
What is Tier 1 and Tier 2 in economics?
Tier 1 Capital – Tier 1 capital consists of shareholders’ equity and retained earnings—disclosed on their financial statements—and is a primary indicator to measure a bank’s financial health, These funds come into play when a bank must absorb losses without ceasing business operations.
- Tier 1 capital is the primary funding source of the bank.
- Typically, it holds nearly all of the bank’s accumulated funds.
- These funds are generated specifically to support banks when losses are absorbed so that regular business functions do not have to be shut down.
- Under Basel III, the minimum tier 1 capital ratio is 10.5%, which is calculated by dividing the bank’s tier 1 capital by its total risk-weighted assets (RWA).
RWA measures a bank’s exposure to credit risk from the loans it underwrites. For example, assume a financial institution has US$200 billion in total tier 1 assets. They have a risk-weighted asset value of $1.2 trillion. To calculate the capital ratio, they divide $200 billion by $1.2 trillion in risk for a capital ratio of 16.66%, well above the Basel III requirements.